There is actually a traditional astro idea that signs are either masculine or feminine; the Fire and Air signs being the “boys” and Earth/Water the “girls.”
It’s maybe more relevant to gardening astrology than anything else but still, under this mode of thinking an Aries woman would not be so right-in-her-skin as an Aries male, the sign being masculine. See Are Aries Women Macho? for a further explanation of this particular conundrum.
But with Pisces, it’s already the last sign of the Zodiac and blessed/cursed with both the fluid/fickle nature of Gemini AND Scorpionic depths of emo. And it’s a feminine sign. So we can argue that Pisces women glide along very nicely in a Neptunian haze of magic, art and commerce whilst the men may be a bit at sea in this ultra-female sign.
In your experience, are Pisces men or Pisces female more likely to embody Haute or Low Pisces? Does the Piscean juju work differently through the different genders? Or is being Pisces a gender all of its own?
I once witnessed a discussion over a barbecue re politics and between an Aries man and a Pisces man get to Defcon 5 in about ten minutes, complete with the Aries brandishing his hot tongs and bellowing “for fuq’s sake man, don’t you have any convictions at all?” and the Pisces denouncing Aries dude as being a paleolithic, non-mindful brute.
Whereas, i suppose the Pisces female is more able to ‘get away’ with being fluid and multi-faceted…No?